%0 Journal Article %J Physical Review A %D 2016 %T Adiabatic optimization versus diffusion Monte Carlo %A Michael Jarret %A Stephen P. Jordan %A Brad Lackey %X

Most experimental and theoretical studies of adiabatic optimization use stoquastic Hamiltonians, whose ground states are expressible using only real nonnegative amplitudes. This raises a question as to whether classical Monte Carlo methods can simulate stoquastic adiabatic algorithms with polynomial overhead. Here, we analyze diffusion Monte Carlo algorithms. We argue that, based on differences between L1 and L2 normalized states, these algorithms suffer from certain obstructions preventing them from efficiently simulating stoquastic adiabatic evolution in generality. In practice however, we obtain good performance by introducing a method that we call Substochastic Monte Carlo. In fact, our simulations are good classical optimization algorithms in their own right, competitive with the best previously known heuristic solvers for MAX-k-SAT at k=2,3,4.

%B Physical Review A %V 94 %P 042318 %8 2016/07/12 %G eng %U https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03389