@article {3504, title = {Phase transition in magic with random quantum circuits}, year = {2024}, month = {4/11/2024}, abstract = {

Magic is a property of quantum states that enables universal fault-tolerant quantum computing using simple sets of gate operations. Understanding the mechanisms by which magic is created or destroyed is, therefore, a crucial step towards efficient and practical fault-tolerant computation. We observe that a random stabilizer code subject to coherent errors exhibits a phase transition in magic, which we characterize through analytic, numeric and experimental probes. Below a critical error rate, stabilizer syndrome measurements remove the accumulated magic in the circuit, effectively protecting against coherent errors; above the critical error rate syndrome measurements concentrate magic. A better understanding of such rich behavior in the resource theory of magic could shed more light on origins of quantum speedup and pave pathways for more efficient magic state generation.

}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10481}, author = {Pradeep Niroula and Christopher David White and Qingfeng Wang and Sonika Johri and Daiwei Zhu and Christopher Monroe and Crystal Noel and Michael Gullans} } @article {2919, title = {Cross-Platform Comparison of Arbitrary Quantum Computations}, year = {2021}, month = {7/27/2021}, abstract = {

As we approach the era of quantum advantage, when quantum computers (QCs) can outperform any classical computer on particular tasks, there remains the difficult challenge of how to validate their performance. While algorithmic success can be easily verified in some instances such as number factoring or oracular algorithms, these approaches only provide pass/fail information for a single QC. On the other hand, a comparison between different QCs on the same arbitrary circuit provides a lower-bound for generic validation: a quantum computation is only as valid as the agreement between the results produced on different QCs. Such an approach is also at the heart of evaluating metrological standards such as disparate atomic clocks. In this paper, we report a cross-platform QC comparison using randomized and correlated measurements that results in a wealth of information on the QC systems. We execute several quantum circuits on widely different physical QC platforms and analyze the cross-platform fidelities.

}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11387}, author = {Daiwei Zhu and Ze-Pei Cian and Crystal Noel and Andrew Risinger and Debopriyo Biswas and Laird Egan and Yingyue Zhu and Alaina M. Green and Cinthia Huerta Alderete and Nhung H. Nguyen and Qingfeng Wang and Andrii Maksymov and Yunseong Nam and Marko Cetina and Norbert M. Linke and Mohammad Hafezi and Christopher Monroe} } @article {2908, title = {Interactive Protocols for Classically-Verifiable Quantum Advantage}, year = {2021}, month = {12/9/2021}, abstract = {

Achieving quantum computational advantage requires solving a classically intractable problem on a quantum device. Natural proposals rely upon the intrinsic hardness of classically simulating quantum mechanics; however, verifying the output is itself classically intractable. On the other hand, certain quantum algorithms (e.g. prime factorization via Shor\&$\#$39;s algorithm) are efficiently verifiable, but require more resources than what is available on near-term devices. One way to bridge the gap between verifiability and implementation is to use \"interactions\" between a prover and a verifier. By leveraging cryptographic functions, such protocols enable the classical verifier to enforce consistency in a quantum prover\&$\#$39;s responses across multiple rounds of interaction. In this work, we demonstrate the first implementation of an interactive quantum advantage protocol, using an ion trap quantum computer. We execute two complementary protocols -- one based upon the learning with errors problem and another where the cryptographic construction implements a computational Bell test. To perform multiple rounds of interaction, we implement mid-circuit measurements on a subset of trapped ion qubits, with subsequent coherent evolution. For both protocols, the performance exceeds the asymptotic bound for classical behavior; maintaining this fidelity at scale would conclusively demonstrate verifiable quantum advantage.

}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05156}, author = {Daiwei Zhu and Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer and Laura Lewis and Crystal Noel and Or Katz and Bahaa Harraz and Qingfeng Wang and Andrew Risinger and Lei Feng and Debopriyo Biswas and Laird Egan and Alexandru Gheorghiu and Yunseong Nam and Thomas Vidick and Umesh Vazirani and Norman Y. Yao and Marko Cetina and Christopher Monroe} } @article {2805, title = {Observation of measurement-induced quantum phases in a trapped-ion quantum computer}, year = {2021}, month = {6/10/2021}, abstract = {

Many-body open quantum systems balance internal dynamics against decoherence from interactions with an environment. Here, we explore this balance via random quantum circuits implemented on a trapped ion quantum computer, where the system evolution is represented by unitary gates with interspersed projective measurements. As the measurement rate is varied, a purification phase transition is predicted to emerge at a critical point akin to a fault-tolerent threshold. We probe the \"pure\" phase, where the system is rapidly projected to a deterministic state conditioned on the measurement outcomes, and the \"mixed\" or \"coding\" phase, where the initial state becomes partially encoded into a quantum error correcting codespace. We find convincing evidence of the two phases and show numerically that, with modest system scaling, critical properties of the transition clearly emerge.

}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05881}, author = {Crystal Noel and Pradeep Niroula and Daiwei Zhu and Andrew Risinger and Laird Egan and Debopriyo Biswas and Marko Cetina and Alexey V. Gorshkov and Michael Gullans and David A. Huse and Christopher Monroe} } @article {2686, title = {Fault-Tolerant Operation of a Quantum Error-Correction Code}, year = {2020}, month = {9/24/2020}, abstract = {

Quantum error correction protects fragile quantum information by encoding it in a larger quantum system whose extra degrees of freedom enable the detection and correction of errors. An encoded logical qubit thus carries increased complexity compared to a bare physical qubit. Fault-tolerant protocols contain the spread of errors and are essential for realizing error suppression with an error-corrected logical qubit. Here we experimentally demonstrate fault-tolerant preparation, rotation, error syndrome extraction, and measurement on a logical qubit encoded in the 9-qubit Bacon-Shor code. For the logical qubit, we measure an average fault-tolerant preparation and measurement error of 0.6\% and a transversal Clifford gate with an error of 0.3\% after error correction. The result is an encoded logical qubit whose logical fidelity exceeds the fidelity of the entangling operations used to create it. We compare these operations with non-fault-tolerant protocols capable of generating arbitrary logical states, and observe the expected increase in error. We directly measure the four Bacon-Shor stabilizer generators and are able to detect single qubit Pauli errors. These results show that fault-tolerant quantum systems are currently capable of logical primitives with error rates lower than their constituent parts. With the future addition of intermediate measurements, the full power of scalable quantum error-correction can be achieved.\ 

}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11482}, author = {Laird Egan and Dripto M. Debroy and Crystal Noel and Andrew Risinger and Daiwei Zhu and Debopriyo Biswas and Michael Newman and Muyuan Li and Kenneth R. Brown and Marko Cetina and Christopher Monroe} }